![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stockscom Report for Sunday April 15, 2001 Publisher: Colin Alexander (613-745-5593) Editor: Ken Wilson (450-691-4617) Subscriptions and Administration: Pierre Fichaud (1 866 487-9711)
Stocks up, bonds down--for
this week, but not a trend reversal Strong likelihood of a bear
market rally in stocks Oils and oil service companies
look better than ever
Market Synopsis
Our
interpretation of recent market action, and particularly last week,
is that stocks have experienced a substantial rally, but one with dimensions
that are routine and which do nothing to suggest the end of the major
downtrend, let alone to suggest the start of a new bull market. The
other side of the coin is that the downdraft in bonds is also substantial,
and possibly enough to suggest caution.
During
the bull market, those of us who were aware of the unprecedented high
valuations in the stock market were concerned that every downdraft in
stocks might be the start of a bear market. Of course, it didn’t happen
for a very long time. The upward zigzag in the indexes continued inexorably
higher. That was, until the eventual top, and the start of a downward
zigzag. During the bull market, you had to keep the faith in the technicals,
which kept the bull market designation in force.
After
so much downward correction in many stocks, and particularly in high
tech, there is a temptation to revert to the previously successful methodology
of buying the dips. The logical corollary of this thinking is that the
bigger the dip, the better the buying opportunity. Put into practice,
this means that money sitting on the sidelines, often in the hands of
pension fund managers, is poured into stocks. It is human nature to
want to buy great stocks at or near the bottom, when they seem to offer
much better value than before.
The
problem with this approach is that it fails to consider either history
or the technical implications of a bear market. Let’s say it again:
A bull market designation derives from a series of upward zigzags on
the monthly chart and a bear market comprises the opposite, a downward
zigzag on the monthly chart. Although you can be certain that one apparent
low will put in the bottom of the market, you can do no more than guess
which one it will be until after the event, when a new upward zigzag
starts.
From
a long-term historical perspective, it is extremely unlikely that the
bear market has run its course, or that it is even close to doing so.
It’s possible that it has done so, but the probabilities are very heavily
weighted against this being the case. Yes, of course, the NASDAQ has
come off by two thirds from its high. Nevertheless, it is still immensely
high by all normal valuation criteria even for high tech stocks, and
more so when you consider that price/earnings multiples are based on
earnings still near the peak of the cycle. Consider that you could buy
Intel in 1990 for some 10 times earnings. How then can the stock now
be worth 19 times earnings, which probably don’t even exist? Certainly,
conditions in the chip business are about as bad as anyone has ever
known and normally that’s a signal to buy the stocks. But there's still
the possibility that worse problems are camouflaged and consequently
their stock prices are simply nearer the bottom than the top they left
behind last year.
It
is our strongly held view that the current downturn in stocks will be
accompanied by a mild recession at a minimum and, more to the point,
a much more serious profits recession than most people are currently
expecting. Memories of an ever-expanding economy and the ever-rising
stock market are still quite fresh in the minds of ordinary investors.
Even now there is still no serious fear, let alone the kind of loathing
for stocks that is associated with bear market bottoms.
Telecom Commentary
At
a gathering this weekend in Kanata, home of major Nortel operations,
the view prevails that this is one powerful company which must prosper
in the long term. Until recently, the same could have been said about
Lucent and their major customer British Telecom, for example. The fact
is that Nortel has been cash-flow negative for well over a year. With
perhaps a billion dollars in the kitty, Nortel is actually in serious
danger of duplicating Lucent's fall and running out of money. Sales
booked by lending the purchase cost AND the cost of setup, configuration,
etc. to your customers can go only so far before you run out of money
to pay for the production of the goods sold on credit.
In
due course, the impact of cash pressures on the likes of Cisco and Nortel,
which of course are the strong companies in high tech, must lead to
layoffs and contraction in expenditures that feed on themselves. Then
this impact flows through to retailing, banking, real estate and so
on, leading uncontrollably to a continuing vicious downward spiral in
stocks. That’s what makes a business contraction.
Historical Perspective
We
think you can largely disregard the action of NASDAQ stocks as a barometer
for the general market. (In fact, despite the massive tumble that we've
witnessed in the NASDAQ, the upward trendline, beginning in 1995 for
this market, was only breached in February of 2001). Regardless of the
smaller sampling of stocks, the action of the Dow Jones Industrials
is probably more indicative of the overall strength or weakness in the
economy. Here we find ourselves looking at the possibilities for the
current bear market by looking at some historical precedents, and not
just the extent of the decline and the duration of the bear market beginning
in 1929:
Top Bottom Duration %Decline
Oct.
1919 119 Aug. 1921 67 22 months 44% Aug.
1929 380 Jun. 1932 42 34
89 July
1937 185 Mar 1938 98 8
47 Nov.
1972 1018 Dec 1974 616 26
40
Bear
Market to date Jan
2000 11,750 Mar 2001
9106 14
23
Looking
at the above sample of bear markets, we believe that the current one
has done nowhere near enough in either time or price to prove the argument
that a mere 23 percent decline is enough to cleanse the excesses of
the greatest bull market in history. On the contrary, we believe in
the general concept that market reactions tend to have a relationship
to the preceding major bull or bear market. Our best guess is that the
Dow will decline to at least 7400 (a decline of 37%), and that the major
downtrend is unlikely to end until the third or fourth quarter of 2002.
Then there will be the opportunity of a lifetime to buy stocks.
Recommended Actions
Despite
our outwardly bearish sentiment, we continue to search for potential
purchases. Given that in a general bear market 90% of all stock prices
decline, the challenge is admittedly difficult. However, we still see
a few stocks where the reward to risk justifies continuing ownership,
mostly among the energy and energy service stocks. Oil and natural gas
do not look as if they are likely to go down substantially, although
there is a strong probability that their highs last winter will not
be exceeded by much, if at all. The main reason for holding them, is
that downside risk is comparably much smaller. Moreover, the addition
of a strong dividend increases the likelihood of never seeing a loss
procured. The pipelines are especially preferable as a balance against
the volatility of world prices for energy.
We
continue our Fed Watch with the expectation of a rate cut sometime before
the next Fed meeting in May. On Tuesday, we will see the publication
of consumer price inflation figures, housing starts and industrial production
numbers, which could steer the market into a new direction or prolong
the rally. Naturally, extending the current rally a notch further would
seriously endanger our portfolio of equities held short.
Regardless
of the market action, we see continuation of the considerable deterioration
of the economy due to a glut in the inventory cycle and the end to the
capital investment boom. A rate cut of 0.5% will do little to correct
this weakness and will not change the downward trend of the markets.
The excesses of the past few years will be worked out of the system
through the actions of the same forces that worked out previous excesses
- lower production, layoffs, bankruptcies, etc. and not through the
use of new technological gadgets.
New
Buy Recommendations:
None.
Stock
Positions to Sell/Exit:
None
List
of Current Stock Recommendations:
·
Rolled from
the March contract and price adjusted
Short
Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home
| About Us | Products
& Services | Market Timing |
Track Record | News
Letters | Order/Subscription
| Contact Us
Disclaimer: Buying and selling stocks and commodity futures involve a high degree of financial risk. Anyone or anything recommended on this website or any recommendation contained in a publication authored by us does not guarantee success in the financial markets. Furthermore, we at Stockscom and its sister publication Fivestar Futures are not finance industry brokers. © Copyright Stockscom. All rights reserved 2001. Privacy Policy Terms & Conditions. Designed & maintained by Leegraphics |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||